ArticleBMC biology2026
Identification of a volatile chemotype associated with resilience to water stress in domesticated varieties of cotton.
Article in BMC biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) mediate plant responses to environmental stresses; yet, their chemotypic variation and drought responsiveness remain poorly characterized in domesticated crops.
resultsHere, we identify a previously undocumented binary chemotype structure in cultivated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), defined by the mutually exclusive production of either bisabolene or guaiene sesquiterpenes. Across 24 genotypes grown under field conditions, 23 genotypes consistently produced one of these compounds (one genotype produced neither one nor the other compound), but never both, revealing a cryptic chemotypic polymorphism associated with different physiological responses to drought. While drought stress reduced leaf water content across all genotypes, the ones in the guaiene chemotype exhibited greater losses. Water limitation also reduced total monoterpene and sesquiterpene concentrations, with the bisabolene chemotype showing stronger declines despite higher constitutive levels. Chemotypes further diverged in their biosynthesis of key damage-induced green leaf volatiles (GLVs). While the guaiene chemotype reduced GLV biosynthetic capacity under prolonged drought, the bisabolene chemotype showed transient increases in GLVs and pathway-specific enzyme activity under short-term stress, suggesting differential physiological resilience. Notably, all genotypes in this study fell within the low γ-terpinene category previously described in wild cotton, indicating that this bisabolene/guaiene variation represents a novel axis of chemical diversity distinct from known wild chemotypes.
conclusionsThese findings position chemotypic variation as a promising, non-destructive biomarker for drought differential responses. By linking chemotype to constitutive VOCs and water status, our work provides new tools for identifying stress-resilient cultivars and advances understanding of phytochemical strategies for crop management in a changing climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.