Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477753›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

A nationwide register study on medicines exiting the reimbursement system in 2010-2022.

Leeni Minkkinen, Hanna Koskinen, Kati Sarnola, Heini Kari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leeni MinkkinenResearch Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland. leeni.minkkinen2@gmail.com.
Hanna KoskinenResearch Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland.
Kati SarnolaResearch Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland.
Heini KariResearch Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational medicines reimbursement systems play a key role in supporting access to medicines. Although inclusion in these systems is important for patients to obtain necessary treatments at affordable costs, medicines exit reimbursement each year. However, research on the later stages of the medicine lifecycle, including reimbursement discontinuation, remains limited. Therefore, we evaluated medicines exiting the national reimbursement system in Finland.

methodsData on all market-authorized medicinal products that exited the reimbursement system for at least one full calendar year between 2010 and 2022 were retrieved from a nationwide database maintained by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland (SII). Reimbursement discontinuation was validated using data from the Pharmaceuticals Pricing Board and the SII's Pharmaceutical Price Register. The study was conducted at the level of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), focusing on whether the entire API exited the reimbursement system. Therapeutic categories, age, price levels, criticality, and market availability after reimbursement discontinuation were examined. Prices per treatment day were calculated using Defined Daily Doses where available. APIs were categorized into short- and long-term use based on expert assessment supported by literature. Descriptive analyses were conducted.

resultsA total of 150 APIs exited the reimbursement system. The most common therapeutic categories were alimentary tract and metabolism (15%), cardiovascular system (15%), and nervous system (11%). Of all identified APIs, 49% were intended for short-term use 51% for long-term use. Overall, 6% of the APIs, including phenoxymethylpenicillin, were listed as critical medicines by the EU. After reimbursement discontinuation, 62% of the APIs remained on the market without reimbursement, whereas 38% were immediately withdrawn. APIs remaining on the market were older than those withdrawn (median age 31 vs. 28 years) and had a lower median price per treatment day (€0.90 vs. €1.50).

conclusionsAPIs, even some classified as critical in the EU, exit the national reimbursement system each year. APIs that remain on the market tend to be older and less expensive than those leaving the market. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring changes in the range of reimbursable medicines and their potential implications for availability and affordability.

Indexed as

Drug CostsInsurance, Health, ReimbursementReimbursement MechanismsFinlandHumansRegistriesDiscontinuation of reimbursementMarket withdrawalMedicinePriceReimbursement status

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.