ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2026
Development of a 3D-printed synthetic tracheal scaffold for partial tracheal wall reconstruction: an experimental animal study.
Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTracheal reconstruction remains a significant clinical challenge due to the difficulty of maintaining airway patency and promoting epithelial regeneration following tracheal injury or resection. Recent advances in tissue engineering have explored 3D-printed scaffolds as potential solutions; however, limitations remain regarding scaffold biocompatibility, mechanical stability, and integration with host tissue. This study evaluated the feasibility of a non-biodegradable polyurethane-polyvinyl chloride (PU-PVC) composite scaffold for partial tracheal wall reconstruction in a rabbit model.
methodsNine New Zealand white rabbits underwent anterior tracheal wall reconstruction using a customized half-pipe PU-PVC scaffold. Scaffold mechanical properties were characterized before implantation. Animals were monitored for 30 days, after which bronchoscopic evaluation was performed to assess luminal patency. Histological analysis was conducted to evaluate epithelialization and inflammatory response. Explanted scaffolds were also assessed for structural integrity and mechanical stability.
resultsThe 30-day survival rate was 88.9% (8/9; 95% CI 51.8%-99.7%), with one death occurring on postoperative day 14. Bronchoscopic examination demonstrated complete luminal patency in all surviving animals, with no evidence of stenosis, obstruction, or mucus plugging. Histological findings demonstrated variable epithelialization, with 50% (4/8) of rabbits showing favorable epithelial coverage accompanied by mild inflammation, while the remaining animals exhibited partial or minimal epithelialization associated with greater inflammatory responses. Post-explant evaluation demonstrated preservation of scaffold structure and mechanical properties, with only minor changes in tensile strength and porosity after implantation.
conclusionIn this preliminary single-cohort feasibility study, the PU-PVC composite scaffold-maintained airway patency throughout the 30-day observation period and demonstrated acceptable short-term mechanical stability following partial tracheal wall reconstruction in a rabbit model. Although epithelialization outcomes were variable and no comparator group was included, the findings support further preclinical investigation of this scaffold platform; however, long-term safety, durability, and biological integration remain to be established. Future studies incorporating appropriate control groups, longer follow-up periods, quantitative assessments of airway patency, and bioactive modifications such as cell seeding or growth factors are warranted to enhance tissue regeneration and better define the scaffold's translational potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.