ReviewJournal of ovarian research2026
Cyclophosphamide-induced animal models of ovarian dysfunction: from molecular mechanisms and modeling strategies to validation criteria.
Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ovarian ageing: from biological constraint to emerging therapeutic frontier.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of ovarian dysfunction is rising annually and trending toward younger populations, significantly compromising the quality of life and reproductive potential of women in their prime childbearing years. Given the multifactorial etiology and complex pathogenesis, ovarian dysfunction requires robust animal models to elucidate underlying mechanisms and evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Due to its well-documented gonadotoxicity, cyclophosphamide (CTX) has become a cornerstone in establishing standardized models of ovarian dysfunction. This review provides a systematic summary of the core mechanisms underlying CTX-induced ovarian dysfunction, with an emphasis on their interconnected regulatory network encompassing oxidative stress, DNA damage and defective repair, apoptosis, cellular senescence, immune-inflammatory responses, autophagy, and ferroptosis. Furthermore, it delineates modeling protocols, encompassing animal species selection, dosing regimens, validation criteria, and outcome evaluation. Several critical limitations in current modeling practices have been identified, including significant inter-study variability in dosing regimens, the indiscriminate application of uniform doses across distinct disease stages, and a dearth of standardized benchmarks for both model establishment and outcome evaluation. Future studies should clarify the mechanistic crosstalk in CTX-induced ovarian injury and identify potential therapeutic targets. Moreover, it is essential to delineate the dose-response relationships, establishment criteria, and evaluation metrics specifically tailored to DOR, POI, and POF. Establishing standardized, graded modeling protocols is critical to providing a reliable framework for the clinical translation of basic research findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.