ArticleBMC oral health2026
Prevalence and determinants of clinical and radiographic outcomes of endodontic treatment at Jimma Medical Center: an ambispective single-cohort study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndodontic treatment is fundamental to preserving teeth affected by pulpal and periapical diseases. Robust evidence on treatment outcomes and their determinants is essential for optimizing clinical practice, yet data from sub-Saharan Africa remain scarce. This study assessed the prevalence, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and determinants of endodontic treatment success and failure among patients treated at Jimma Medical Center (JMC), Ethiopia.
methodsAn ambispective single-cohort study was conducted among a sample of 404 patients who received endodontic treatment at JMC from September 1, 2025, to November 30, 2025. Data were collected on socio-demographics, preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics, procedural details, and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and radiographic success was assessed using the Periapical Index (PAI) and symptom resolution. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of treatment outcomes, with adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated, and statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe majority of participants were aged 25-44 years (49.6%) and female (55.8%), with an overall treatment success rate of 84.2%. Most teeth were non-vital (96.4%) and presented with symptomatic pulpitis or apical periodontitis. Irrigation was primarily performed with saline (85.2%), and optimal obturation quality was achieved in 90.1% of cases. At follow-up, 84.2% of teeth were classified as successful, defined as absence of symptoms and PAI ≤ 2, while 15.8% failed. The most frequent causes of failure were persistent infection (42.6%) and coronal leakage (41.0%). Patient-reported outcomes indicated high satisfaction, with 89.1% of patients reporting satisfaction and 73.0% reporting complete absence of pain post-treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified several independent determinants of treatment success. Male patients had 2.86 times higher odds of treatment success than female patients (AOR = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.98-3.53; p < 0.04). Conversely, symptomatic periapical lesions or abscesses were associated with 43% lower odds of treatment success (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.05-0.86; p < 0.03). Similarly, the use of saline as the primary irrigant was associated with 54% lower odds of treatment success than H₂O₂ alone or saline combined with H₂O₂ (AOR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21-0.91; p < 0.04). In addition, a temporary or inadequate coronal seal at treatment completion was associated with 62% lower odds of treatment success than a composite restoration or crown (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.88; p < 0.02).
conclusionEndodontic treatment at JMC demonstrates a high success rate, with most teeth showing favorable clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. Male gender, preoperative periapical pathology, type of primary irrigant, and coronal restoration quality were significant determinants of treatment outcome. These findings underscore the importance of meticulous procedural protocols and proper coronal sealing to enhance treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.