ArticleBMC oral health2026
Factors associated with Iraqi dental students' intention to perform dental implant therapy after graduation: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify the demographic, educational, and perceptual factors associated with undergraduate dental students' intentions to perform dental implant therapy after graduation.
methodsA cross-sectional analytical study was conducted during the 2024-2025 academic year among fourth- and fifth-year dental students (n = 304). A structured online questionnaire collected data on demographic characteristics, sources of implant-related information, perceived importance of dental implants, preferred management of severely compromised teeth, views on the delivery of the implantology curriculum (stand-alone versus integrated), and self-reported familiarity with implant systems. Associations were examined using chi-square tests and multivariable binary logistic regression (α = 0.05).
resultsOverall, 65.8% of the respondents (200/304) indicated an intention to perform implant therapy after graduation. In the adjusted logistic regression model, intention was higher among students who preferred extraction followed by implant placement than among those who preferred root canal treatment with build-up (AOR = 2.26; 95% CI 1.24-4.12; p = 0.008). Lower odds of intention were observed among female students (AOR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.25-0.94; p = 0.033), students who rated implants as "very important" (AOR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.12-0.60; p = 0.001) or "important" (AOR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-1.00; p = 0.049) compared with "essential," and students who did not support implantology as a separate subject (AOR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.96; p = 0.038).
conclusionsFuture intention to perform dental implant therapy was associated mainly with treatment preference, perceived importance of implant therapy, and views on implantology teaching as a separate subject, rather than academic stage or informal learning sources. These findings suggest that clinically meaningful undergraduate implant education may be more closely associated with professional intention than exposure alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.