ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Exploring differences in alveolar microbiome between pulmonary tuberculosis patients with different treatment outcomes: a metagenomic study from China.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate differences in the composition and functional characteristics of alveolar microbiota in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) exhibiting differential therapeutic responses. Thirty-two patients with drug-sensitive PTB who had completed standard anti-tuberculosis therapy were enrolled and classified into good-response (n = 16) and poor-response (n = 16) groups. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected and analysed using metagenomic sequencing to characterize microbial community and functional pathways. No significant differences were observed in α-diversity between the two groups; however, β-diversity analysis demonstrated moderate but significant in microbial community structure (ANOSIM, R = 0.381, P < 0.001). The good efficacy group was characterized by enrichment of Prevotella, Staphylococcus, and oral commensal bacteria including Fusobacterium and Rothia, together with significantly increased pathways related to peptidoglycan biosynthesis, glutathione metabolism, energy production, and DNA repair. In contrast, the poor efficacy group was characterised by enrichment of Microbacterium and activation of functional pathways associated with biofilm formation. These findings suggest that both the taxonomic composition and functional activity of the pulmonary microbiome are closely associated with anti-tuberculosis treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.