Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477638›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2026

Six-month follow-up of the 'Mi Mejor Plan' school-based prevention program: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial among early adolescents in Chile.

Jorge Gaete, Natalia Ríos, Saray Ramírez, Gabriel Salgado, Cristian A Rojas-Barahona, Ricardo Araya

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04236947 (Randomized Control Trial of the Effectiveness of the Social Competence Promotion Program for Young Adolescents Aimed at Preventing Substance Use Among Students in Chile), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04236947 naunknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Control Trial of the Effectiveness of the Social Competence Promotion Program for Young Adolescents Aimed at Preventing Substance Use Among Students in Chile

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de los Andes, ChileRan2022 to 2023Enrolled600ConditionsSubstance UseArmsSCPP-YA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge GaeteFaculty of Social Sciences, School of Education, Research Center for Student Mental Health (ISME), Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile. jgaete@uandes.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-6018
Natalia RíosFaculty of Social Sciences, School of Education, Research Center for Student Mental Health (ISME), Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Saray RamírezFaculty of Social Sciences, School of Education, Research Center for Student Mental Health (ISME), Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Gabriel SalgadoFaculty of Nursing and Obstetrics, School of Nursing, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Cristian A Rojas-BarahonaFaculty of Psychology, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Ricardo ArayaDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo FONIS SA19I0115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchool-based preventive interventions for adolescent substance use often show limited short-term behavioral effects, with evidence suggesting that sustained impacts may depend on continued exposure and reinforcement strategies such as booster sessions. However, few studies have examined the longitudinal effects of booster implementation on substance use and related psychosocial outcomes in culturally adapted interventions.

methodsWe conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the longitudinal impact of a culturally adapted school-based prevention program among sixth-grade adolescents (mean age 11.3 years) in Chile. Schools assigned to the intervention received a 16-session curriculum and three booster sessions, whereas control schools continued with treatment-as-usual prevention activities. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and approximately six months later following completion of the booster sessions. Primary outcomes were substance use behaviors (30-day prevalence of tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis), while secondary outcomes included cognitive and social determinants. Mixed-effects models were used to assess changes over time, accounting for clustering at the school level.

resultsA total of 765 students from 11 schools were enrolled, with 608 assessed at baseline and 426 at follow-up. While no significant reductions in substance use were observed immediately post-intervention, longitudinal analyses indicated improvements in selected secondary outcomes, including more negative beliefs about tobacco and alcohol and enhanced decision-making processes. Several cognitive and social determinants remained improved at the assessment conducted after completion of the booster sessions. An increase in positive beliefs about marijuana was also observed at follow-up. However, effects on behavioral outcomes remained limited across time points.

conclusionsSeveral cognitive and social determinants of substance use remained improved at follow-up despite the absence of significant behavioural effects. Longer-term studies are needed to determine whether these changes translate into reductions in substance use.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04236947; registration date: 17/01/2020. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04236947.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentChildChileCluster AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationAcceptabilityAdolescentsFeasibilityFidelityPreventionSubstance Abuse

Identifiers

PMID42477638
PMCPMC13670815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.