ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Comprehensive Individualized nursing intervention enhances health outcomes and quality of life in patients with heart failure.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) is associated with high morbidity, readmissions, and impaired quality of life. Because patient responses vary, tailored, nurse-led strategies, particularly in nutrition, activity, and psychosocial support, may address needs that routine care does not fully meet.
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of an individualized, nurse-led intervention integrating nutrition, graded exercise, and psychosocial support in patients with HF.
methodsThis prospective, single-center, parallel-group study involved adults with HF (n = 110 per group), who were assigned to groups using an odd-even allocation method. The control group (CG) received routine nursing care. The observation group (OG) received the same routine care plus a 3-month individualized program comprising customized nutritional counseling, staged exercise guidance, and structured psychosocial support with follow-up. Baseline and follow-up assessments consisted of measuring time to symptom resolution, cardiac function, arterial blood gases, nutritional status, psychological status, quality of life, and adverse events between the two groups.
resultsCompared with routine nursing care (CG), individualized nurse-led care (OG) had shortened time to symptom improvement (dyspnea 2.05 ± 0.61 vs. 2.57 ± 0.76 days; p < 0.001), improved cardiac function (LVEF, CO ↑; LVEDD, LVESD ↓; 6MWT ↑; all p < 0.05), enhanced gas exchange (PaCO₂ ↓, PaO₂ ↑; both p < 0.05), and better nutritional status (p < 0.05). Additionally, the OG had improved psychological status (p < 0.05), enhanced quality of life (SF-36 75.43 ± 9.03 vs. 66.43 ± 9.09; p < 0.05), and fewer adverse events (6.36% vs. 20.0%; χ²=7.462; p = 0.006).
conclusionAn individualized nurse-led intervention is associated with multidomain benefits in patients with HF, supporting the integration of personalized nursing strategies into routine HF care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.