ArticleBMC primary care2026
Considerations in referring older patients to hospital in acute situations: a qualitative study based on the experiences of healthcare providers.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital referral in acute situations is a complex process with a significant impact on older adults. This study aims to explore the considerations of healthcare providers from both primary and secondary care when deciding whether or not to refer an older patient to the hospital in acute situations. By including perspectives of different health care providers, this study seeks to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the decision-making process.
methodsIn February 2025, three online semi-structured focus group discussions were conducted with 16 primary and secondary healthcare providers. Three case studies (two hip fractures, one COPD exacerbation) guided the discussion. Data were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis and were iteratively clustered and visualized around four key consideration factors.
resultsTwenty subthemes were identified and mapped onto four overarching main themes, corresponding to the four key consideration factors: patient-related (e.g. network, quality of life, patient and family preferences, emotional status and living situation), healthcare provider-related (e.g. professional attitude, collaboration and familiarity with patients), case-specific (e.g. age, medical history, activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility, cognitive functioning, frailty, prognosis, the acuity of situation, alternative treatment, and risk of complications) and structural factors (e.g. ability to arrange appropriate care and the patients' increasing care demand).
conclusionsDecision-making in hospital referrals is not determined solely by the acute condition, but is a complex and dynamic process. This highlights the importance of strengthening interprofessional communication and collaboration, addressing the shortages in the availability of appropriate patient care, and extending advance care planning (ACP) practices by involving family members to support more patient-centred referral decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.