ArticleScientific data2026
A 5.0 T Ultra-High-Field fMRI Dataset for Naturalistic Visual Scene Processing.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A 5.0 T Ultra-High-Field fMRI Dataset for Naturalistic Visual Scene Processing.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling neural responses under naturalistic visual stimulation is an important goal in computational neuroscience and brain-computer interface research. Progress in this area depends on neuroimaging datasets that combine repeated measurements, shared stimulus anchors, and sufficient stimulus diversity for evaluating encoding and decoding models. Here, we present the Natural Vision Dataset (NVD), a publicly available 5.0 T fMRI dataset designed for static natural-image viewing. The field strength is reported as part of the acquisition context, and the dataset was not designed to isolate field-strength effects or to compare 5.0 T performance with 3 T or 7 T acquisitions. Twenty healthy participants viewed a shared set of 1,268 natural images and 500 participant-specific images per participant, yielding 10,000 participant-specific images across the dataset. Each image was presented three times across separate sessions. This hybrid shared-unique stimulus design supports assessment of response reliability, cross-participant alignment, and model generalization beyond a fixed shared image set. Functional data were acquired at 1.8 mm isotropic resolution with a TR of 1 s and are organized according to the Brain Imaging Data Structure, with both volumetric and surface-based derivatives provided. Image-level response estimates were derived using GLMsingle toolbox. Data quality and benchmark utility were characterized using motion, vigilance, tSNR, noise-ceiling, and brain-to-CLIP decoding analyses. NVD provides a standardized resource for investigating human visual representations and evaluating computational models of natural-image processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.