ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Why it's better to believe in a larger definition of the diametaphyseal junction zone in pediatric distal radius fractures.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiametaphyseal radius fractures (DMRF) in children are characterized by special biomechanical behavior. They present with a stereotypical loss of reduction (radial translation and ulnar tilt) of the distal fragment when stabilized with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN), the standard osteosynthesis for pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures. No consensus has been found on the definition of the diametaphyseal junction zone (DMJZ). Some authors claim that diaphyseal fractures immediately proximal to the metaphysis, as defined by the AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (AO-PCCF), can safely be stabilized with ESIN. They confine the DMJZ to a small part within the metaphysis. Other definitions of the DMJZ extend slightly more proximally, including a small part of the distal diaphysis. The forearm fracture index (FFI) calculates the ratio of the fracture's distance to the radius' growth plate over its width and defines DMRF to have an FFI between 1 and 2. The aim of this case series was to demonstrate that these particular fractures, which can be considered diaphyseal according to the AO-PCCF, still exhibit biomechanical characteristics typical of DMRF. MATERIALS AND
methodsRadiologic and clinical outcomes of 11 DMRF, that would be considered diaphyseal by the AO-PCCF classification but fall into the DMJZ when using the FFI, are being reported.
results7 fractures were treated with ESIN and 4 with transepiphyseal percutaneous intramedullary Kirschner-wire (TEPIK) fixation. ESIN osteosynthesis led to only a small reduction in angulation but a notable increase in translational dislocation in the a.p. radiograph, both typical dislocation patterns seen in DMRF. Fractures stabilized with TEPIK, an osteosynthesis technique obeying the biomechanical demands of DMRF, did not present with these stereotypical dislocation patterns.
conclusionsThe biomechanical demands typical of DMRF also apply to very distal diaphyseal forearm fractures. Hence, a larger definition of the DMJZ might include all fractures with the characteristic biomechanical behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.