ArticleJournal of food science2026
Effect of Microwave Power Cycle on Temperature Uniformity, Microbial Inactivation, and Quality: Computational Approach for Milk Thermal Processing.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microwave power control is commonly achieved either by magnetrons` on-and-off power cycling or inverter-based continuous control to obtain the desired power. Although previous studies have focused on the effect of power cycling on temperature uniformity, its implications on microbial safety and quality remain insufficiently understood. In this study, the effect of different on-and-off power cycle configurations at a fixed duty cycle (0.5) on temperature evolution and microbial and enzymatic inactivation kinetics was investigated. For this purpose, milk was chosen as the sample food product, and the required evaluations were carried out using a finite element-based multiphysics model. The results showed that different power cycle settings led to significantly different temperature increase rates despite the identical final temperature and absorbed power by the sample. While temperature uniformity was not significantly affected due to the natural convection effects triggered in the liquid sample, microbial inactivation kinetics varied substantially. Longer on-cycle durations resulted in rapid temperature increases and higher inactivation levels. Besides the microbial inactivation, enzymatic quality degradation, represented by γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) inactivation, was strongly influenced by the applied power cycles, indicating the requirement to balance the microbial inactivation with quality preservation. These results demonstrate that power cycle-induced temperature profiles play a critical role in determining safety and quality outcomes in microwave processing. This study further highlights the requirement of reporting power cycle settings explicitly in microwave processing to ensure repeatability and comparability. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates that the same microwave power level does not always yield the same results in the view of temperature dependent effects since different power cycle settings lead to various temperature histories. Hence, especially in industrial settings, safety and quality cannot be controlled by average power inputs only. Instead, the power cycle configuration must be carefully selected and monitored with its effects on the temperature change of the product. These findings might assist in designing microwave processes to ensure required microbial inactivation while minimizing quality losses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.