Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477266›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2026

Active Transport Health Model: Valuing the Health Benefits of Active Transport.

Mary Njeri Wanjau, Holger Möller, Christopher Standen, Fiona Haigh, J Lennert Veerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary Njeri WanjauPublic Health and Economics Modelling Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4588-7528
Holger MöllerSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington Campus, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0675-8712
Christopher StandenInternational Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, High St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8027-6773
Fiona HaighInternational Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, High St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-5118
J Lennert VeermanPublic Health and Economics Modelling Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia. l.veerman@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-8232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActive transport can increase physical activity at the population level, thereby improving population health. Knowing the health and related economic benefits of infrastructure measures that change physical activity may help underpin the case for investment, but valuing such benefits is challenging.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a model to estimate the health benefits of changes in active transport behaviour and translate these to an economic value. We applied the model to the state of New South Wales, Australia.

methodsThe The Active Transport Health Model is a proportional multi-state lifetable model that quantifies the health impacts of changes in active transport behaviour over a population's lifetime. Health outcomes related to physical activity, air pollution and road trauma are modelled. Model outputs include age- and sex-specific changes in disease incidence, prevalence and mortality, summarised as health-adjusted life-years, which are translated to monetary terms. Changes in healthcare costs are also modelled. Values per additional person-kilometres of walking and cycling are reported (in Australian dollars). A 5% discount rate is applied.

resultsCompared to car use, the health benefits for an additional person-kilometre walked are AU$4.41 (95% uncertainty interval AU$3.81-AU$5.05), and AU$2.42 (95% uncertainty interval AU$2.05-AU$2.76) for an additional person-kilometre cycled. This varies with various factors such as age and current physical activity level.

conclusionsThe Active Transport Health Model can be used to assess and value the health benefits of active transport. The monetary per-kilometre values in our study were higher than those of previous studies. This has important implications for infrastructure planning and guidelines on transport projects where monetised health benefits of physical activity are factored into cost-benefit analyses.

Indexed as

BicyclingTransportationWalkingAdolescentCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleNew South WalesQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID42477266
PMCPMC13498497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.