Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477215›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Learning curve and patient outcomes in gallstone surgery: a national register-based cohort study.

Nathalie Young, Lars Enochsson, Hans Pettersson, Peter Elbe, Ninos Oussi, Gabriel Sandblom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathalie YoungDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden. nathalie.young@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-7581
Lars EnochssonDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hans PetterssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter ElbeDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ninos OussiCentre for Clinical Research, Region Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Gabriel SandblomDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus on, or a defined minimum number of surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomies required to be considered an independent surgeon. The aim of the present study was to assess how surgical outcomes improve with surgical volume.

methodData on laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by surgical trainees and surgeons between 2006 and 2022 were retrieved from the Swedish national register for gallstone surgery (GallRiks). Surgeons who had not registered the number of procedures performed before first GallRiks entry were excluded. Comparisons regarding operation time and postoperatively observed complications were divided into strata of 50 performed procedures.

resultsBetween 2006 and 2022, 139,010 cholecystectomies were performed by surgeons (n = 1664) who had not yet performed 2000 procedures. The mean operation time decreased from 111 min (95% confidence interval (CI) 111-112 min) to 75 min (95% CI 73-77 min) after 800 completed procedures. During the first 50 procedures, the incidence of postoperatively observed complications was 4.7 and 7.0%, respectively, if the cholecystectomy was performed with or without a registered assistant (p = 0.007). The difference in the incidence of complications for assisted and unassisted procedures remained statistically significant up to 250 interventions performed.

conclusionImprovement in surgical outcomes and shorter operation time were observed over a long course of the expected learning curve. Although the presence of an assistant had a significant impact on the outcome during the initial phase of the learning curve, we do not know to what extent the assistant took part in the procedure. In GallRiks, only the presence of an assistant is registered, not what the assistant did during the procedure.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGallstonesLearning CurveAdultAgedClinical CompetenceCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesSwedenTreatment OutcomeComplicationsExtended learning curveLaparoscopic cholecystectomyLearning curveOperative timeRegistry study

Identifiers

PMID42477215
PMCPMC13633137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.