Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477208›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Development of a Deep Learning Model for Automated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Volume in

Ryusuke Nakamoto, Koji Fujimoto, Ryo Sakamoto, Masahiro Yakami, Tomomi W Nobashi, Hiroyoshi Isoda, Masako Kataoka, Yuji Nakamoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryusuke NakamotoPreemptive Medicine and Lifestyle Related Disease Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan. inabook@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-6654
Koji FujimotoDepartment of Advanced Healthcare Informatics, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ryo SakamotoDepartment of Real World Data R&D, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Masahiro YakamiPreemptive Medicine and Lifestyle Related Disease Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomomi W NobashiPreemptive Medicine and Lifestyle Related Disease Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyoshi IsodaPreemptive Medicine and Lifestyle Related Disease Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Masako KataokaPreemptive Medicine and Lifestyle Related Disease Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuji NakamotoDiagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop a deep learning-based automated trunk muscle volumetry method using whole-body CT from PET/CT and evaluate its performance against bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In this retrospective study, an nnU-Net-based segmentation model was developed using a three-step iterative refinement strategy with 20 manually annotated datasets. Trunk muscles were segmented in 209 individuals (median age 52 years, IQR 47-60.3; 148 men) undergoing PET/CT and BIA. Model performance was validated using Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) compared BIA-derived trunk muscle mass with that estimated by automated 3D volume or conventional 2D L3 cross-sectional area (CSA). Williams' t test compared dependent correlations. The segmentation model achieved a DSC of 0.991. Automated 3D muscle volume demonstrated a significantly stronger correlation with BIA-derived mass (r = 0.961; 95% CI: 0.948, 0.970) compared to 2D L3-CSA (r = 0.912; 95% CI: 0.886, 0.933; P < 0.001). While 3D volumetry maintained high correlations in both sexes (r = 0.898 for both), 2D L3-CSA showed significantly reduced performance in men (r = 0.757; P < 0.001 vs. 3D). Automated 3D volumetry provides a significantly more robust assessment of muscle mass than conventional 2D metrics by capturing whole-trunk anatomical variations. This framework enables accurate, scalable body composition analysis directly from routine PET/CT workflows without additional radiation.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyDeep learningPositron emission tomographySarcopeniaSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.