Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477190›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026

Gut microbiota dynamics in free-range layer hens during outbreaks of spotty liver disease and fowl cholera-a field study.

Friedrich Petranyi, Maria M Whitton, Edina Lobo, Sung J Yu, Ivan Milošević, Dragana Stanley, Yadav S Bajagai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Friedrich PetranyiInstitute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4702, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5348-8543
Maria M WhittonInstitute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4702, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2395-5809
Edina LoboInstitute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4702, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4388-4849
Sung J YuInstitute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4702, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-5007
Ivan MiloševićFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Oslobodjenja 18, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-8770
Dragana StanleyInstitute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4702, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-4726
Yadav S BajagaiInstitute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4702, Australia. y.sharmabajagai@cqu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-071X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The livestock industry faces growing constraints due to antimicrobial resistance, particularly in poultry systems that have historically relied on antibiotic use. These challenges are exacerbated in free-range production, where restrictions on antimicrobial interventions coincide with heightened exposure to infectious diseases, leading to increased mortality and reduced productivity. On-farm disease outbreaks cannot be reproduced in high ethics standards approved animal houses, where they can be modeled to recognize some patterns of pathogen dynamics. While laboratory settings enable rigorous control and monitoring, they lack the environmental, management, production, pathogen pressures and complexity found on industrial farms and therefore cannot realistically recreate disease progression. Here, we present a field study in a layer flock that experienced three disease outbreaks of spotty liver disease (SLD) and fowl cholera (FC). The treatment group was supplemented with a precision biotic, a synthetic glycan product, while weekly performance measures and responses of microbial populations across major gut sections were observed. The precision biotic supplemented birds showed higher cumulative mortality but also higher egg output. However, as this was an unreplicated field study, these differences should be interpreted as descriptive associations. The intestinal microbial community responded differently to supplementation under concurrent environmental and disease pressures. This study provides large-scale field observations during concurrent outbreaks of SLD and FC, offering real-world insights that may inform future controlled studies of disease dynamics and performance management. KEY POINTS: • Free-range systems increase disease risk, reducing health and productivity in layer flocks. • Precision biotics were associated with higher egg output and higher cumulative mortality in hens. • Gut microbiota and liver congestion differed between precision biotic supplemented and control groups.

Indexed as

ChickensDisease OutbreaksGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLiver DiseasesPoultry DiseasesAnimalsFemalePolysaccharidesPolysaccharidesFowl choleraLayer henMicrobiotaPrecision glycanSpotty liver disease

Identifiers

PMID42477190
PMCPMC13669276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.