ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Is the adult EBMT risk score valid and relevant for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children acute leukemia?
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The EBMT risk score, incorporating five factors to estimate the risks associated with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult patients, has not been validated in children. This study aims to assess this score in 9447 children undergoing allogeneic HSCT for acute lymphoblastic or myeloid leukemia (ALL/AML) between 2010 and 2021. Risk factors were coded according to the original EBMT score. In both ALL (n = 5774) and AML (n = 3673), only disease status and the time from diagnosis to HSCT significantly impacted all the outcomes in the multivariable analysis. The combination of female donors and male recipients did not affect overall survival (OS), relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and leukemia-free survival (LFS). Additionally, the prognostic impact of donor type was not evident; when viewed as two modalities, the impact of MSD versus non-MSD on different outcomes in ALL was inconsistent with those observed in AML. Consequently, in both ALL and AML, scores ranging from 3 to 5 significantly affected all outcomes, whereas a score of 2 did not significantly impact NRM or RI in AML. Therefore, this analysis demonstrates that the adult EBMT risk score is not entirely reliable in children with acute leukemia, highlighting the need for a new pediatric-specific prognostic score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42477158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.