ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Pain management and early recovery after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in a short-stay ambulatory pathway: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate a bundled multimodal analgesia-centered management protocol within a short-stay ambulatory robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) pathway and to assess postoperative pain control, rescue analgesic requirements, analgesia-related adverse reactions, early recovery, and short-term safety. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the clinical data of 161 consecutive patients who underwent RAPN at our hospital between June 2021 and June 2025. The short-stay ambulatory pathway was defined as a fast-track pathway with postoperative observation and planned discharge within approximately 48 h after surgery, rather than true same-day discharge. According to the perioperative care model received, patients were divided into a short-stay ambulatory RAPN group (n = 84) and a conventional inpatient RAPN group (n = 77). Baseline characteristics, tumor complexity, surgical indicators, analgesic medication, postoperative pain scores, adverse events, recovery outcomes, and 30-day safety outcomes were compared. Continuous variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges), and categorical variables as numbers (percentages). Exploratory adjusted sensitivity analyses evaluated rescue analgesia, 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain, and time-weighted mean NRS from PACU through 48 h. Baseline age, BMI, tumor diameter, RENAL score, PADUA score, operative time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative renal function were generally comparable between the two groups. Preemptive non-opioid analgesia as a protocolized preoperative pathway component was used in 84 patients (100.0%) in the short-stay ambulatory group and in 0 patients (0.0%) in the conventional inpatient group. The ambulatory group had lower rescue analgesic requirements (7 [8.3%] vs. 21 [27.3%]) and lower pain scores at fixed postoperative time points and during discharge-anchored follow-up. The time-weighted mean NRS from PACU through 48 h was 3.16 (0.98, 4.95) versus 5.00 (3.00, 6.44). In exploratory adjusted analyses, the ambulatory pathway remained associated with lower rescue analgesia (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.54), lower 24-hour moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.78), and lower time-weighted mean NRS from PACU through 48 h (adjusted beta - 1.77, 95% CI -2.46 to -1.07). Among the 84 patients in the ambulatory group, 78 (92.9%) were discharged successfully as planned; no unplanned readmission or reoperation occurred within 30 days. In selected patients undergoing RAPN, a short-stay ambulatory pathway centered on bundled multimodal analgesia and extended nursing follow-up was associated with lower pain scores, reduced rescue analgesic use, earlier recovery, and acceptable short-term safety. These findings support feasibility in carefully selected patients but do not establish superiority; prospective multicenter validation and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42477149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.