ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Machine learning-based identification of lactate metabolism-associated biomarkers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine lactate metabolism-associated biomarkers for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Based on NAFLD datasets from the gene expression omnibus database and lactate metabolism-related genes from GeneCards database, NAFLD-lactate metabolism hub genes (NAFLD-LM HGs) were screened via differential analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis and four machine learning algorithms. Their diagnostic efficacy was evaluated; molecular subtyping was performed; single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was subsequently conducted; and validation was finally conducted in NAFLD mouse models. We finally screened out eight NAFLD-LM HGs, namely CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (CEBPA), flavin containing dimethylaniline monooxygenase 1 (FMO1), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1), krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), myelocytomatosis oncogene (MYC), nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2 (NR4A2), and thymidylate synthase (TYMS), with a diagnostic rate of 0.798 and an area under the curve of 0.948. These genes drove the molecular heterogeneity in NAFLD patients by modulating of metabolism and immune microenvironment. The results of scRNA-seq clarified that Th17 cells were identified as the most abundant annotated cell subset. Through animal experiments, five genes (LDLR, MYC, IGFBP1, NR4A2, and KLF4) were established to have potential protective effects against NAFLD. Five genes (LDLR, MYC, IGFBP1, NR4A2, KLF4) are identified as "protective factors", and their downregulation is associated with NAFLD progression. The remaining three genes (CEBPA, FMO1, TYMS) exhibit inconsistent expression patterns, suggesting bidirectional regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.