Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477135›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026

High-performance gas measurement systems-bridging the gap between sensors and analytics.

Andreas Schütze, Tilman Sauerwald, Christian Bur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreas SchützeLab for Measurement Technology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. schuetze@lmt.uni-saarland.de.
Tilman SauerwaldFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising, Germany.
Christian BurLab for Measurement Technology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In gas measurements, there is inherent competition between sensors and analytical systems, often made difficult by a lack of understanding of approaches and constraints from both sides. This leads to controversies, sometimes simple to avoid or defuse, but sometimes leading to harsh discussions and resentment of "wrong" concepts from the respective other side. Meanwhile, collaboration between disciplines is often a key to scientific and, in the long term, economic and societal success. This is especially true today, when digitization is the pervasive topic in our society and where "sensors act as a bridge between biology and digitization." This article addresses this conflict for the field of high-performance gas measurement systems, where the two worlds of low-cost sensor systems on the one hand and high-performance analytical instruments on the other are still often at odds.

Indexed as

CalibrationDigitizationGas measurement systemsHigh-performanceMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42477135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.