ArticleScientific data2026
The FAIR Case for A Coherent Interoperability to support NHS 10 Year Health Plan.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an urgent need to improve the data infrastructure supporting access to patient information within the National Health Service (NHS), England's publicly funded healthcare system. Delivering effective, patient-centred care depends on timely access to accurate and sufficient patient information. However, achieving this remains challenging in a fragmented health and care environment, where a longitudinal patient record depends on interoperable information sharing across organisational and geographical boundaries. The health and care landscape in England is characterised by considerable organisational, technical, and governance complexity, resulting in substantial variation in digital maturity and information sharing capability across health and care settings. Within this heterogeneous environment, effective interoperability depends not only on the ability to exchange data but also on the alignment of standards, governance, and organisational capability. These interdependencies suggest that achieving coherent interoperability requires more than isolated technical solutions. Rather, they highlight the need for a unifying framework for interoperability that integrates standards, governance, and implementation, informed by internationally recognised standards and approaches. Such a framework could help shift the focus from recurring debates and isolated initiatives towards more consistent, scalable, and sustainable interoperability. Notably, current research provides limited guidance on how data governance and standards stewardship can be coordinated to achieve coherent interoperability across direct care systems. Existing approaches have largely focused on technical integration and standards implementation, with comparatively less attention has been given to the governance, semantic, and lifecycle processes required to sustain interoperability at system scale. This paper explores the role of data and standards management as foundational components of interoperability and considers the potential of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Principles as a framework for advancing interoperability in direct care. Drawing on FAIR-aligned health research initiatives, we suggest that extending FAIR-informed approaches from health research to direct care within the NHS could provide a unifying framework for more coherent interoperability, while informing future standards governance, policy, procurement, and legislation in support of the NHS 10-Year Health Plan (2025-2035).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.