Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42476920›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Biomass-to-Methanol, Waste-to-Methanol, or PtX?─Quantifying the Sustainability of Alternative Methanol Production Pathways Using Life Cycle Assessment, Techno-Economic Analysis, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.

Raoul Voss, Antonia Helf, Georg Weig, Florian Keller, Roh Pin Lee, Magnus Fröhling, Martin Gräbner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raoul VossChair of Circular Economy and Sustainability Assessment, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Am Essigberg 3, Straubing94315, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7097-7958
Antonia HelfInstitute of Energy Process Engineering and Chemical Engineering, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg (TUBAF), Fuchsmühlenweg 9 D, Freiberg09599, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7875-0050
Georg WeigChair of Circular Economy and Sustainability Assessment, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Am Essigberg 3, Straubing94315, Germany.
Florian KellerInstitute of Energy Process Engineering and Chemical Engineering, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg (TUBAF), Fuchsmühlenweg 9 D, Freiberg09599, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-5257
Roh Pin LeeChair of Decarbonization & Transformation of the Industry, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (BTU), Erich-Weinert-Strasse 1, Cottbus03046, Germany.
Magnus FröhlingChair of Circular Economy and Sustainability Assessment, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Am Essigberg 3, Straubing94315, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5429-1163
Martin GräbnerInstitute of Energy Process Engineering and Chemical Engineering, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg (TUBAF), Fuchsmühlenweg 9 D, Freiberg09599, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sustainable production of methanol is gaining increasing global interest due to its potential to enable both defossilization and carbon circularity not only for the sustainability transformation of the chemical industry, but also for other carbon-intensive industries such as transportation and energy. This study comparatively evaluates the production of methanol via (1) Biomass-to-Methanol, (2) Waste-to-Methanol, and (3) Power-to-X (PtX) using life cycle assessment (LCA), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Focusing on Germany, findings enable insights into technical (i.e., energy demands, product yields), environmental (i.e., impacts on climate change, terrestrial acidification, fossil depletion), and economic (i.e., investments, net present value, investment payback periods) parameters. These are presented as detailed physical results, complemented by economic metrics, and are further aggregated through expert assessment using analytic hierarchy processing. The use of alternative carbon feedstocks in the form of wood and packaging waste is observed to improve both environmental and economic performance. In contrast, PtX leads today not only to significantly more emissions but also to more costs. Study insights thus provide timely quantitative input to inform decision-making processes relating to the sustainability of alternative methanol pathways for the transformation of carbon-intensive sectors.

Indexed as

BiomassMethanolDecision Support TechniquesMethanolchemical recyclingCO2 emissionscostsgasificationinvestmentsliquefactionprofitabilitypyrolysisrecyclingsustainable waste management

Identifiers

PMID42476920
PMCPMC13449891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.