ArticleChemical research in toxicology2026
ADMET-XSpec: A Tool for Systematic Cross-Species Data Integration in ADMET Prediction.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of in silico methodologies has reshaped modern drug discovery and toxicology research; however, robust prediction of ADMET endpoints remains limited by the scarcity and heterogeneity of experimental data. In particular, toxicological data sets are often fragmented across species, complicating the development of reliable and generalizable machine learning models. To address this challenge, we introduce a dedicated Python-based computational package, ADMET-XSpec, designed for the systematic development, training, and evaluation of ML models with an explicit consideration of interspecies data integration. The framework enables controlled incorporation of chemical space originating from different species and different assay types, allowing users to flexibly construct single-species models, as well as models augmented with cross-species information. This design facilitates systematic investigation of how additional data from other organisms influence model performance without imposing assumptions inherent to specific transfer learning paradigms. By supporting standardized preprocessing, scalable integration of heterogeneous data sets, and rigorous benchmarking, the proposed tool provides a unified environment for studying cross-species effects in ADMET modeling. Overall, this work delivers a practical resource for the ADMET modeling community and offers insights into how interspecies and interassay data integration can improve model robustness and generalizability while clarifying the conditions under which cross-species and cross-assay data information is beneficial for predictive toxicology. The package is freely available at https://github.com/hubertrybka/admet-xspec. ADMET-XSpec advances the state of the art by providing the first dedicated framework for controlled interspecies and interassay data integration in ADMET modeling, offering quantitative guidance on when and how cross-species and cross-assay data improve predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.