Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42476742›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Mixed-methods evaluation protocol for the Now & Next programme: a codesigned, family-centred peer-led caregiver support programme.

Sara Cibralic, Sylvana Mahmic, Anoo Bhopti, Margaret L Kern, Lulu Barker, Prasadhini De Silva, Eram Afroze, Kylie Aekins, Valsamma Eapen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara CibralicPsychiatry and Mental Health/School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia s.cibralic@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1888-2956
Sylvana MahmicPlumtree Children's Services, Marrickville, New South Wales, Australia.
Anoo BhoptiSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care/Department of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Margaret L KernCentre for Wellbeing Science/Faculty of Education, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lulu BarkerPsychiatry and Mental Health/School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Prasadhini De SilvaPsychiatry and Mental Health/School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Eram AfrozePlumtree Children's Services, Marrickville, New South Wales, Australia.
Kylie AekinsPlumtree Children's Services, Marrickville, New South Wales, Australia.
Valsamma EapenPsychiatry and Mental Health/School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-8306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs the rates of child developmental delay and disability (referred onwards as developmental needs) increase globally, so does the number of caregivers caring for a child with developmental needs. It is well known that caring for a child with disability and/or delay leads to many challenges. While historically intervention services have focused on the child, it is increasingly being recognised that a whole family intervention approach is needed to improve both child and caregiver outcomes. The Now & Next programme is a family-centred, peer-led support programme targeted at improving caregiver skills in developing strengths-based goals across child, family and personal domains, taking practical steps to achieve these goals and building a support network. In doing so, the programme aims to improve goal achievement as well as caregivers' capacity to plan and navigate supports, sense of competence, empowerment, community support and overall quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use a mixed-methods design, drawing on both quantitative and qualitative components. Quantitative data will measure changes in caregiver and child outcomes compared with a control group, while qualitative data will investigate caregivers' experiences with the programme, including their perspectives on facilitators and barriers to programme engagement. Appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics will be used to evaluate quantitative data. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the University of New South Wales research ethics committee (iRECS10368). Findings will be shared through conference presentations and published manuscripts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12626000083392 (Trial registered on ANZCTR).

Indexed as

CaregiversChildren with DisabilitiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesPeer GroupSocial SupportChildChild, PreschoolFamily SupportHumansProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeResearch DesignCaregiversPsychosocial InterventionRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID42476742
PMCPMC13386041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.