ArticleBMJ open2026
Diaphragmatic speckle-tracking ultrasound for predicting successful liberation from mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVentilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction is increasingly recognised as an important complication of prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) and a major contributor to difficult weaning and extubation failure. Although bedside diaphragmatic ultrasound has emerged as a useful tool for assessing diaphragm function, conventional indices such as diaphragm excursion and thickening fraction may be influenced by ventilatory mechanics and patient effort. Speckle-tracking ultrasound (STU), a deformation-based technique adapted from echocardiography, allows assessment of diaphragmatic strain and strain rate and may provide a more accurate evaluation of diaphragmatic contractility. However, the predictive utility of diaphragmatic STU for successful liberation from MV remains uncertain. This study aims to systematically review the available evidence on the predictive performance of diaphragmatic speckle-tracking ultrasound for successful weaning from MV in adult patients.
methodsThis protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and is registered in the PROSPERO database. A comprehensive search will be conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS/BVS and CENTRAL without restrictions on language or publication date. Observational studies and clinical trials evaluating diaphragmatic speckle-tracking ultrasound during the weaning process in adults receiving invasive MV for more than 24 hours will be eligible. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool for diagnostic and predictive accuracy studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomised trials. When feasible, meta-analysis will be conducted using Review Manager software. The certainty of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420261338352.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.