Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42476732›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in major laparoscopic abdominal surgery (IMPACT-Scope): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Wudi Ma, Ciro Morgese, Wei Xiong, Yuxiao Liu, Jinyu Wu, Qiulan He, Ming Wei, Jiangtao Zhou, Ruiming Liang, Natalie Ives and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06666985 (Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Major Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06666985 phase4recruitingnot on this map

Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Major Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery (IMPACT-Scope): a Randomised, Sham-controlled, Blinded, Multicentre Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled700ConditionsPatients Undergoing Major Laparoscopic Abdominal SurgeryArmsITM + Usual Care, Sham ITM + Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Wudi Ma *Department of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ciro Morgese *Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Wei XiongDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuxiao LiuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1108-501X
Jinyu WuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qiulan HeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ming WeiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiangtao ZhouDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ruiming LiangDepartment of Medical Statistics, Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Natalie IvesBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-7541
Fangzhou XuDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Louise JacksonHealth Economics Unit, Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Matthew SodenBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kar Keung ChengDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-1857
Fang Gao SmithDepartment of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Xia FengDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China fengxia@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective perioperative pain management is a cornerstone of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, yet standard opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia often leads to insufficient pain control, excessive adverse reactions and delayed recovery following laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has shown promising analgesic efficacy in abdominal and obstetric procedures but high-quality evidence supporting its use in major laparoscopic surgery remains limited. The ITM for postoperative analgesia in major laparoscopic abdominal surgery (IMPACT-Scope) trial aims to determine whether ITM, when added to usual care, improves postoperative recovery quality compared with usual care alone. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, parallel-group, two-arm, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, superiority trial with an integrated full health economic evaluation. A total of 700 adult patients undergoing elective major laparoscopic or robotic abdominal surgery at 15 tertiary teaching hospitals in South and Central China will be enrolled. Participants are randomised (1:1) to assign either ITM (300 µg of preservative-free morphine) or sham ITM plus usual care. The primary outcome is the quality of recovery at postoperative day (POD) 1, measured by the 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-15). Secondary outcomes include QoR-15 at POD 2 and POD 3, opioid consumption, postoperative mobilisation, adverse events and length of stay. Health economic and safety evaluations are embedded. Analysis will follow the modified intention-to-treat principle using regression models adjusted for minimisation variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol (V.2.0, approved on 11 October 2024) has been reviewed and approved by the IEC for Clinical Research and Animal Trials of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Ref number: 20240222) and the local ethics committees of all participating sites. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and media communications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06666985 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered 31 October 2024. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06666985. Recruitment began in December 2024. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER AND DATE: 2.0, 13 September 2024.

Indexed as

AbdomenAnalgesics, OpioidLaparoscopyMorphinePostoperative PainAdultChinaDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInjections, SpinalMulticenter Studies as TopicPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryERASIntrathecal morphineMajor laparoscopic surgerypostoperative analgesiaQuality of RecoveryRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID42476732
PMCPMC13386047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.