ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Frontline immunotherapy with response-guided subsequent treatment (FIRST) in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a Bayesian causal analysis of dose intensity, early benefit, and treatment de-escalation.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProgrammed death receptor 1 (PD-1) blockade produces high response rates in resectable and locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), but how many doses are needed and whether surgery or radiation after immunotherapy (consolidation) adds benefit in deep responders (patients with substantial clinical responses) remain unclear. Observational inference is challenging because treatment decisions are response-guided, doses accumulate over time, and treatment selection depends on patient characteristics that also affect outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 189 patients with resectable, borderline-resectable, locally advanced, or limited metastatic CSCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as part of management (2019-2025). We summarized responses, treatment discontinuation patterns, and time-to-event outcomes. To evaluate dose-response relationships, we fit Bayesian regression models adjusting for prespecified baseline confounders. Directed acyclic graphs were used to formalize causal assumptions and identify minimally sufficient adjustment sets. For event-free survival (EFS), we used a prespecified landmark analysis among patients receiving ≥2 doses to reduce guarantee-time bias.
resultsObjective response occurred in 119/189 (63%), including 52/189 (27.5%) complete responses. Nearly half of patients received ≤2 doses (92/189, 48.7%). Among 50 complete responders managed without surgery, 1 recurrence was observed over a median follow-up of 25.4 months. Dose-response models showed a consistent but modest positive association between additional doses and response: in a linear model, each additional dose was associated with ~1.09 fold higher odds of response (posterior probability >95%). Flexible threshold models suggested early concentration of benefit, strongest at 2 versus 1 dose (93.6% posterior probability of benefit), with persistent uncertainty in effect magnitude (66% probability of ≥6 percentage-point absolute increase). In the EFS landmark modeling cohort (n=177), receipt of ≥3 versus 2 doses showed a 93% posterior probability of reduced event risk, but the 89% credible interval spanned the null (HR 0.61-1.01), indicating substantial uncertainty regarding incremental downstream benefit.
conclusionsIn real-world CSCC, durable disease control frequently occurred after limited immunotherapy exposure, and clinical responders often did well without routine surgical consolidation. Although additional doses may modestly improve outcomes, observed gains appear concentrated early with uncertain incremental value beyond two doses. These patterns support conceptualizing treatment as frontline immunotherapy with response-guided subsequent treatment rather than fixed-duration neoadjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.