ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2026
Time-dependent laryngeal desensitisation following topical lidocaine and prilocaine application in cats: a randomised controlled study.
Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the effects of topical prilocaine and lidocaine, relative to topical 0.9% sodium chloride, on laryngeal reactivity in anaesthetised cats prior to endotracheal intubation. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blind study, 24 healthy adult cats were enrolled and allocated to topical prilocaine, topical lidocaine or topical 0.9% sodium chloride (n = 8/group) following anaesthesia with a standardised medetomidine-propofol protocol. The calculated volume of each local anaesthetic corresponding to 2 mg/kg, prepared from 2% stock solutions, was diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride to a standardised final volume of 0.5 mL and atomised onto the arytenoid and vocal fold regions.
resultsRelative to sodium chloride, prilocaine was associated with lower laryngeal reactivity at earlier time points (15 to 45 seconds), whereas lidocaine showed a later onset (from 60 seconds onward). Between 60 and 90 seconds, both prilocaine and lidocaine resulted in lower reactivity scores than sodium chloride, and no difference was observed between prilocaine and lidocaine at any assessed time point. No clinically evident adverse events were recorded during clinical monitoring of SpO CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Topical prilocaine and lidocaine reduced laryngeal reactivity compared with topical 0.9% sodium chloride under the conditions of this study. The observed reductions occurred within the assessed 15 to 60 seconds interval; however, intubation conditions were not evaluated as comparative outcomes, and the clinical implications should therefore be interpreted in relation to laryngeal reactivity rather than direct measures of intubation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.