Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42476592›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2026

Time-dependent laryngeal desensitisation following topical lidocaine and prilocaine application in cats: a randomised controlled study.

A Gölgeli Bedir, L E Yanmaz, Y Akçora, Ç Özkalıpçı, Ö T Orhun, Y Kocaman, S Okur

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A Gölgeli BedirDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-8638
L E YanmazDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-8271
Y AkçoraDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6104-8393
Ç ÖzkalıpçıDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9402-5679
Ö T OrhunDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-8879
Y KocamanDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-7782
S OkurDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2620-897X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the effects of topical prilocaine and lidocaine, relative to topical 0.9% sodium chloride, on laryngeal reactivity in anaesthetised cats prior to endotracheal intubation. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blind study, 24 healthy adult cats were enrolled and allocated to topical prilocaine, topical lidocaine or topical 0.9% sodium chloride (n = 8/group) following anaesthesia with a standardised medetomidine-propofol protocol. The calculated volume of each local anaesthetic corresponding to 2 mg/kg, prepared from 2% stock solutions, was diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride to a standardised final volume of 0.5 mL and atomised onto the arytenoid and vocal fold regions.

resultsRelative to sodium chloride, prilocaine was associated with lower laryngeal reactivity at earlier time points (15 to 45 seconds), whereas lidocaine showed a later onset (from 60 seconds onward). Between 60 and 90 seconds, both prilocaine and lidocaine resulted in lower reactivity scores than sodium chloride, and no difference was observed between prilocaine and lidocaine at any assessed time point. No clinically evident adverse events were recorded during clinical monitoring of SpO CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Topical prilocaine and lidocaine reduced laryngeal reactivity compared with topical 0.9% sodium chloride under the conditions of this study. The observed reductions occurred within the assessed 15 to 60 seconds interval; however, intubation conditions were not evaluated as comparative outcomes, and the clinical implications should therefore be interpreted in relation to laryngeal reactivity rather than direct measures of intubation performance.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalLarynxLidocainePrilocaineAdministration, TopicalAnimalsCatsDouble-Blind MethodIntubation, IntratrachealProspective StudiesTime FactorsAnesthetics, LocalLidocainePrilocaine

Identifiers

PMID42476592
PMCPMC13539693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.