ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2026
One dose of adjuvant 8 Gray postoperative radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma excised with narrow margins: Low toxicity and comparable efficacy to conventional radiotherapy.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) recurs in 17% to 30% of patients with stage I to II disease, with local recurrence rates between 2% and 27%. Per established guidelines, conventional postoperative radiotherapy (cPORT; ∼50 Gray across 25 fractions) should be considered for localized MCC when risk factors are present. cPORT can be morbid and logistically challenging. Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) of 8 Gray has utility and low toxicity for palliation but remains underexplored postoperatively.
objectiveEvaluate postoperative SFRT for stage I to II MCC, compared to observation and cPORT.
methodsLocal recurrences were assessed for observation (n = 108 patients), cPORT (n = 156), or SFRT (n = 43) groups.
resultsObservation patients had fewer per-patient risk factors (mean: 1.2 vs 1.6 for SFRT [P = .020] and 1.6 for cPORT [P = .001]). Despite this, 3-year local control was better for cPORT (97.4%; P < .001) and SFRT (100%; P = .012) groups than observation (91.0%), particularly in patients with narrow surgical margins (≤1 cm). Adverse events occurred in 21% of SFRT patients (all grade 1). LIMITATIONS: Single-center retrospective study.
conclusionsThe SFRT group experienced improved local control relative to observation and had comparable local control to the cPORT group. For early-stage narrowly excised MCC, SFRT is feasible, well tolerated, and warrants exploration in a prospective multicenter study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.