ArticleBehavioural processes2026
Impacts of variation in experimental parameters on larval zebrafish behavior: Enhancing rigor and reproducibility in neurobehavioral research.
Article in Behavioural processes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Larval zebrafish have become a cornerstone in neurobehavioral research. However, the reproducibility of zebrafish behavioral studies is often hindered by subtle yet significant variations in experimental parameters. This study systematically investigates how variations in experimental parameters-well geometry; area; plate opacity; genotype; holding temperature; and light intensity-influence larval zebrafish baseline activity and behavioral responses. Using automated behavioral tracking and sample sizes ranging between 73 and 192 larvae/group, we uncovered evident differences in response to changes in these conditions. When assessing geometry and area, larvae in square wells and larger well areas displayed heightened baseline and stimulus-induced behavioral responses; however, relative comparison contradicted these findings indicating smaller areas significantly exaggerated the magnitude of behavioral responses. Clear plates elicited stronger baseline activity and stimulus-driven behaviors. Wild-type fish showed higher behavioral responses than mutants. Temperatures significantly modulated baseline activity and stimulus-induced behavior, while relative comparison analysis revealed increases in stimulus-induced responses across both extremes. Lastly, intermediate light intensities elicited the strongest reactivity, indicating a non-linear relationship between illumination and visual-motor-response behaviors. Our study demonstrates that variation in experimental parameters can alter behavioral outcomes, underscoring the need for standardized zebrafish neurobehavioral assays and for accounting for methodological differences when comparing results. Developing this framework will improve the reliability and interpretability of zebrafish behavioral data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.