ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026
Rescue deep brain stimulation for recurrent essential tremor after ventral intermediate nucleus thalamotomy: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedication-refractory essential tremor (ET) patients who undergo MR-guided focused ultrasound or Gamma Knife thalamotomy may experience tremor recurrence, prompting rescue deep brain stimulation (DBS). Yet, the impact of prior ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) lesioning on DBS targeting, microelectrode recording (MER), and stimulation programming remains uncertain. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present 3 ET patients undergoing bilateral DBS for tremor recurrence after thalamotomy. Thalamotomy lesions showed depressed electrophysiological activity versus nonlesioned VIM on MER (p = 0.0397) and required smaller DBS charge density increases for tremor control, suggesting irreversible lesion effects despite tremor recurrence. Tremor recurrence correlated with lesion mislocation; specifically, ablations missed the central VIM (mean 1.8 mm) and decussating dentato-rubro-thalamic tract. For rescue DBS, ventral VIM stimulation yields the greatest tremor reduction, while central VIM stimulation balanced tremor control with adverse effects. LESSONS: DBS is a safe, effective rescue treatment for failed thalamotomy without needing to retarget the prior lesion site. The authors advocate for prospective studies of initial DBS targeting 2 mm anterior to standard VIM coordinates, reducing intraoperative readjustment for central VIM stimulation; and initial thalamotomy targeting 1 mm anterior and 1.2-1.5 mm superior to standard coordinates for durable tremor control through ablation of both central and ventral VIM. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25955.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.