ArticleInternal medicine journal2026
Radiologist review at the time of lung nodule referrals saves clinic appointments and fast tracks investigations: results of the outpatient respiratory nodule management (Ornament) study.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith increased awareness around the National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP), there are increased general practitioner (GP) referrals to outpatient clinics for evaluation of incidental computed tomography (CT)-detected lung nodules (ILNs). We studied how expert radiologist review of the referral chest CT could mitigate clinic numbers and expedite urgent cases.
methodAn Ethics Committee-approved 'virtual triaging' of referrals was performed. The radiologist reviewed referral CT scans, blinded to the clinic outcomes. Brock score was calculated before and after radiologist review, and the NLCSP category was assigned to allow 'virtual' triaging. NLCSP Category 1-4 cases were 'virtually' referred back to the GP. Category 5 and 6 cases were triaged for clinic/procedure as urgent/very urgent respectively.
resultsFrom 6 months of referrals, 101 consecutive cases were reviewed in four half-hour meetings with a radiologist, thoracic physician and clinic nurse. Referrals were 52 males and 49 females, the mean age was 67.0 ± 12.0 years, and the mean Brock score was 13.9 ± 13.8. Fifty-four cases (53%) were deemed Category 1-4, needing no appointment. Thirty-three cases were deemed suspicious of lung cancer (NLCSP Category 6), resulting in early 'virtual' appointments saving 37.3 ± 28 days wait time (range 0-89 days). Comparing actual to virtual, clinic numbers saved were 131 (336 vs 205, P < 0.001) and clinic preparation hours saved were 83.4 (170.5 vs 87.1, P < 0.001). Meeting costs including CT retrieval time (AU$2171) were balanced by savings from reduced clinic preparation time (AU$3582).
conclusionThis cost-effective strategy demonstrates dual benefits of managing rising referral numbers and fast-tracking urgent cases for procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.