Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42475511›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026

Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Octogenarians: Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-Network Registry.

Manabu Yamasaki, Hideaki Yoshino, Takashi Kunihara, Kojiro Morita, Koichi Akutsu, Tomoki Shimokawa, Hitoshi Ogino, Mitsuhiro Kawata, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Michio Usui and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Manabu YamasakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Juntendo University, 2-2-1 Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6396-0437
Hideaki YoshinoTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4976-4055
Takashi KuniharaTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Kojiro MoritaDepartment of Nursing Administration and Advanced Clinical Nursing, Tokyo University, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2306-0669
Koichi AkutsuTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Tomoki ShimokawaTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Hitoshi OginoTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KawataTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Toshiyuki TakahashiTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Michio UsuiTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6588-3305
Takeshiro FujiiTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Shun KohsakaTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-2972
Takeshi YamamotoTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.
Morimasa TakayamaTokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, 2-23-1 Yoyogi, Shibuyaku, Tokyo151-0053, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe increasing prevalence of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) among octogenarians necessitates robust, large-scale data to inform surgical decision-making and risk stratification. Thus, we investigated the multicentre Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-Network database to demonstrate in-hospital mortality trends in this vulnerable patient population.

methodsWe analysed patients with ATAAD transported to the network's participating hospitals between January 2015 and December 2022. The study population was stratified into 2 age-based groups: octogenarians (≥80 years) and non-octogenarians (<80 years). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors of in-hospital mortality specifically within the octogenarian group.

resultsAmong 5361 patients, 1467 (27.4%) were octogenarians. Overall mortality was significantly higher in the octogenarians compared to non-octogenarians (34.5% vs 15.9%; P < .001), whereas operative mortality for those undergoing surgery remained acceptable (10.5% vs 8.1%; P = .035). Multivariable analysis revealed that open false lumen (odds ratio [OR], 3.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-5.67; P < .001), shock at arrival (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.68-4.08; P < .001), out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OR, 18.99; 95% CI, 7.72-46.72; P < .001), in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OR, 17.39; 95% CI, 6.21-48.67; P < .001), and cerebral malperfusion (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.16-4.06; P = .016) were related to higher mortality in octogenarian patients. Conversely, surgical intervention (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10-0.22; P < .001) and higher serum albumin levels (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.00; P = .049) were associated with lower risk of mortality.

conclusionsAlthough octogenarians with ATAAD had higher overall mortality, operative mortality among selected patients undergoing surgery remained acceptable, suggesting that advanced age alone should not preclude surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionDissection, Ascending AortaOctogenariansAcute DiseaseAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTokyoTreatment Outcomeacute aortic dissectionnetworkoctogenarians

Identifiers

PMID42475511
PMCPMC13384056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.