ArticlePLoS pathogens2026
An emergent biofilm program from inactivation of Candida albicans master regulators Efg1 and Ndt80.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two Ume6 target gene classes in the biofilm regulatory network ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biofilm formation by the fungus Candida albicans is a central virulence trait that enables colonization of implanted medical devices and mucosal surfaces. Biofilm formation reflects a complex regulatory network, and depends upon multiple master regulators that include transcription factors Efg1 and Ndt80. It is well established that efg1Δ/Δ and ndt80Δ/Δ single gene mutants are defective in biofilm formation. We report here that an efg1Δ/Δ ndt80Δ/Δ double mutant of reference strain SC5314 is able to form a robust biofilm in vitro and in vivo. We refer to the efg1Δ/Δ ndt80Δ/Δ biofilm as an emergent biofilm because this phenotype could not have been predicted from the phenotypes of efg1Δ/Δ or ndt80Δ/Δ single gene mutants. In four additional strain backgrounds, efg1Δ/Δ ndt80Δ/Δ mutants do not form biofilms, but in all strain backgrounds the efg1Δ/Δ ndt80Δ/Δ mutants can form filamentous cells, which are components of biofilms. Emergent biofilm formation is especially pronounced in YPD + FBS medium at 30°C, and RNA-seq under those conditions reveals altered expression in the efg1Δ/Δ ndt80Δ/Δ double mutant of biofilm-related genes: upregulation of BCR1, UME6, and HGC1, and downregulation of ALS3, BRG1, and HWP1. These gene expression changes suggest that the emergent biofilm program is partially distinct from the conventional biofilm program. This inference is supported by functional analysis: emergent biofilm formation is independent of Brg1, Rob1, Tec1, and Wor3, all of which have positive roles in conventional biofilm formation. Emergent biofilm formation depends upon the hyphal cyclin Hgc1, the biofilm transcription factors Bcr1 and Ume6, and the Bcr1/Ume6-activated adhesin gene FLO9. The seemingly simple emergent biofilm program may represent a primordial surface colonization strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.