Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42475388›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Automated concrete crack detection enhanced by deep learning and generative adversarial networks.

Yue Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yue ChangLiaoning Provincial Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2211-5527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cracks on the surface of concrete structures are an obvious indication of their condition. However, traditional visual inspection methods are significantly influenced by human factors. They are accurate for larger cracks. However, they introduce subjective judgment when detecting smaller cracks. They also pose safety risks. Automated detection methods face challenges in achieving lightweight implementation due to limited annotated data and difficulties in complex environments. This paper proposes a method for detecting and measuring concrete cracks. The method uses a generative adversarial network (GAN) to augment data and a U-Net segmentation network. Conditional GAN (cGAN) is proposed to generate high-fidelity crack images using training-set data only, avoiding data leakage and effectively solving insufficient sample issues. A U-Net segmentation network that has been enhanced performs crack segmentation. This network incorporates channel attention modules and dilated residual blocks. A hybrid loss function that combines the Dice coefficient and binary cross-entropy resolves class imbalance. Fractal theory quantifies the geometric features of the detected cracks. The crack segmentation model that was trained on cGAN-augmented datasets achieved an average precision (AP) of 82.03% and an F1 score of 83.24%, as demonstrated by experimental results. The fractal dimension-based crack measurement method achieves an accuracy of ≤4% error for complex crack networks (fractal dimension >1.6). The proposed method provides a reproducible, automated, high-precision solution for concrete crack detection and quantification, with verified stability and engineering applicability.

Indexed as

Construction MaterialsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsDetection AlgorithmsGenerative Adversarial NetworksGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID42475388
PMCPMC13384272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.