ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Quantifying the spatiotemporal mechanical dynamics of engineered cardiac microbundles.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brightfield time-lapse imaging is widely used in cardiac tissue engineering, yet the absence of standardized, interpretable analytical frameworks limits reproducibility and cross-platform comparison. We present an open, scalable computational pipeline for quantifying spatiotemporal contractile dynamics in microscopy videos of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microbundles. Building on our open-source tools "MicroBundleCompute" and "MicroBundlePillarTrack," we define a suite of 16 interpretable structural, functional, and spatiotemporal metrics that capture tissue deformation, synchrony, and heterogeneity. The framework integrates full-field displacement tracking, strain reconstruction, spatial registration, dimensionality reduction, and topology-based vector-field analysis within a unified workflow. Applied to a dataset of 670 cardiac microbundles spanning 20 experimental conditions, the pipeline reveals continuous variation in contractile phenotypes rather than discrete condition-specific clustering, with intra-condition variability often exceeding inter-condition differences. Redundancy analysis identifies a reduced core set of 10 metrics that retain most informational content while minimizing multicollinearity. Analysis of denoised displacement fields shows that contraction is dominated by a global isotropic mode, with localized saddle-type deformation patterns present in approximately half of the samples. All software and workflows are released openly to enable reproducible, scalable analysis of dynamic tissue mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.