Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42475327›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Data-driven analysis of heterogeneous gait subgroups and ground reaction forces based on integrated center of pressure-center of mass dynamics in poststroke hemiparesis.

Kimihiko Mori, Tatsuya Teramae, Masanori Wakida, Naoto Mano, Yuta Chujo, Takayuki Kuwabara, Meguru Taguchi, Kimitaka Hase, Tomoyuki Noda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kimihiko MoriFaculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-4400
Tatsuya TeramaeDepartment of Brain Robot Interface, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Seika, Kyoto, Japan.
Masanori WakidaFaculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Naoto ManoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Yuta ChujoFaculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-1151
Takayuki KuwabaraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kansai Medical University Kori Hospital, Neyagawa, Osaka, Japan.
Meguru TaguchiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Kimitaka HaseDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoyuki NodaDepartment of Brain Robot Interface, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Seika, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHemiparetic gait is characterized by abnormal ground reaction forces (GRFs) with impaired control of the center of mass (CoM) relative to the center of pressure (CoP). Although both anteroposterior and mediolateral gait control have been examined separately, how their integrated stance-phase-derived CoP-CoM interactions and local CoP-based features relate to GRF characteristics remains unclear.

objectiveThis exploratory study aimed to explore the relationships between CoP-CoM and CoP-based dynamics and GRFs and descriptively identify candidate gait subgroups of individuals with poststroke hemiparesis using a data-driven clustering approach.

methodsSeventy-eight community-dwelling individuals with poststroke hemiparesis participated in a three-dimensional gait analysis. Stance-phase-derived CoP-CoM parameters of the transverse plane and local CoP-based loading metrics were extracted during the paretic stance phase. Relationships between these gait metrics and GRFs, particularly early braking force, propulsion, and late braking force, were examined using nonparametric correlation analyses. K-means clustering was performed to explore candidate gait subgroups, and inter-cluster differences were exploratorily examined.

resultsAcross all participants, several CoP-CoM interaction metrics showed significant correlations with GRFs. In particular, insufficient forward progression of the CoM relative to the CoP during late stance showed a strong correlation with late braking force (rs = 0.79). Clustering suggested the presence of four candidate gait subgroups characterized by differing combinations of anteroposterior and mediolateral CoP-CoM dynamics and local CoP loading features. However, the results of clusters with small sample sizes warrant cautious interpretation.

conclusionsIntegrated stance-phase-derived CoP-CoM dynamics and CoP-based parameters may highlight heterogeneity in hemiparetic gait and may have meaningful associations with GRF characteristics. The candidate gait subgroups should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and may offer a descriptive framework for understanding diverse gait disorders.

Indexed as

GaitParesisStrokeAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaCluster AnalysisFemaleGait AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressure

Identifiers

PMID42475327
PMCPMC13384309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.