ArticlePloS one2026
Views on mental health recovery in primary and community mental healthcare services in Thailand: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cultural Adaptation and Implementation Strategy of a Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Training Intervention (REFOCUS-THAIREC) for Healthcare Workers in Thailand: An Experience-Based Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStrong community-based services and healthcare providers with a clear understanding and positive attitudes towards recovery, are central to delivering good quality mental health care in collaboration with service users. Although recovery has been explored in several Asian contexts, its interpretation remains diverse, and consensus on the definition and meaning of personal recovery in Thailand is limited. Further research is needed to explore how mental health service users, carers, and healthcare professionals understand and experience recovery and recovery support, in order to advance recovery-oriented practice within the local sociocultural context.
aimTo explore thoughts, perceptions, and experiences of mental health service users, carers, and healthcare professionals on mental health recovery and recovery support in Thailand.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study using reflexive thematic analysis, which forms the experience gathering phase of an Experience Based Co-Design (EBCD) study. Thirty semi-structured interviews and two feedback workshops with three service users and eight healthcare professionals were conducted.
resultsFour themes were identified: (i) conceptions of mental health recovery, (ii) attitudes towards recovery, (iii) characteristics of a successful recovery journey, and (iv) factors impeding recovery. Participants viewed recovery as beginning with clinical and functional improvement, progressing to personal recovery characterised by hope, meaning, and social connectedness. Family support, community acceptance, and supportive healthcare relationships were central to recovery, while barriers operated at individual, family, service, and community levels.
conclusionThis study integrates the perspectives of mental health service users, carers, and healthcare professionals to generate new insights into personal recovery within Thai community mental health care. From these findings, we propose a culturally situated Recovery Support Model that foregrounds the interconnected roles of personal agency, family involvement, professional engagement, and community support as drivers of recovery-oriented practice within the Thai mental health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.