Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42475243›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Nodal Error behind Discrepancies between Coupled Cluster and Diffusion Monte Carlo.

S Lambie, P López Ríos, D Kats, A Alavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S LambieMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research , Heisenbergstraße 1, Stuttgart70569, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-4738
P López RíosMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research , Heisenbergstraße 1, Stuttgart70569, Germany.
D KatsMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research , Heisenbergstraße 1, Stuttgart70569, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7274-0601
A AlaviMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research , Heisenbergstraße 1, Stuttgart70569, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-9489

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The small magnitude and long-range character of noncovalent interactions pose a significant challenge for computational quantum chemical and electronic structure methods alike. State-of-the-art coupled cluster (CC) theory and benchmark-grade diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) are ideally positioned to tackle these problems, but concerning differences between both methods have been reported in numerous studies of the interaction energy of noncovalently bound dimers. Given that the basic theoretical frameworks underpinning both methods are exact in principle, the error must arise from one or several of the approximations required to make the calculations computationally tractable. Here, we carry out a rigorous and systematic examination of the effect of each of these approximations using the acetic acid dimer and water-peptide systems as convenient testing grounds. Thanks to the use of stringently optimized backflow wave functions, we are able to find that the significant discrepancies are dominated by the fixed-node error incurred by the Slater-Jastrow DMC result, while errors in the CC calculations do not significantly alter the result. This finding, likely applicable to other hydrogen-bonded systems, helps establish that CC should be regarded as the benchmark for these systems and can potentially guide the search for pragmatic solutions to the fixed-node problem in the future.

Identifiers

PMID42475243
PMCPMC13472088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.