ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2026
Gender-Based Differences in Arthroplasty Utilization Across Two Tertiary Academic Centers.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen have a higher prevalence of osteoarthritis and report worse symptoms, yet they undergo joint replacement surgery (JRS) at lower rates than men. Studies suggest that cultural norms, healthcare access, physician biases, and patient preferences may contribute to disparities, but consensus on gender-specific barriers in JRS utilization remain unclear.
methodsFrom a database of JRS candidates seen in 2022 at two tertiary academic centers, patients who were offered but declined surgery were invited to participate in focus groups (FGs). Demographics, Kellgren-Lawrence grades, symptom duration, visual analog pain score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and nonsurgical treatments were collected. Statistical analysis included chi-square, analysis of variance, and t-tests. FGs explored patient treatment experiences using code-based qualitative analysis.
resultsThe database cohort included 976 patients (140 shoulder, 493 hip, and 343 knee), with 60% female. No notable sex differences were found in JRS utilization. FG participants (n = 24) included 12 women and 12 men. Women were younger than men (70.9 ± 9.6 vs. 73.4 ± 6.1). Both men and women reported negative physician interactions and identified return to lifestyle as key in influencing surgery decisions. Men expressed concerns about hobbies, recovery support, and felt encouraged to undergo surgical treatment. Women prioritized household responsibilities, cosmetic outcomes, and trialed alternative treatments more often and endorsed age- and gender-based biases in care.
conclusionGender-based differences influence patient experiences and decision making regarding JRS. Although men felt supported in pursuing surgery, women perceived bias and exhausted conservative treatments first. These findings highlight the need for shared decision-making frameworks that address gender-based disparities in surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.