Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42475096›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Instructional Emphasis and PHQ-9 and GAD-7 Scores Among Participants With Anxiety or Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sean D Young, William G Cumberland, Desirée A Fehmie, Dominic Ugarte

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956378 (Effects of Emphasizing Instructions on Mental Health Questionnaires), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06956378 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effects of Emphasizing Instructions on Mental Health Questionnaires

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2025 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsInstruction Emphasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean D YoungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
William G CumberlandDepartment of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
Desirée A FehmieDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
Dominic UgarteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is widely used to assess depression, and the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is widely used to assess anxiety, yet the extent to which subtle differences in instruction delivery influence symptom scores is poorly understood. Objective: To determine whether emphasizing instructional wording alters PHQ-9 and GAD-7 responses among US adults with depression or anxiety. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 17 to May 30, 2025. Participants included US adults with self-reported clinician-diagnosed or treated major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder, recruited via online advertisements and assessed by telephone. Interventions: Participants completed the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 twice within the same session. Control participants received standard instructions for both administrations. Intervention participants received standard instructions initially and, for the second administration, were reminded to attend to the wording of the questionnaire instructions, with emphasis placed on the word bothered. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was changes in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 total scores. Secondary outcomes were a score reduction greater than 20% and categorical change in score severity (eg, moderate to mild). Results: Among 200 total participants (n = 100 in the intervention group and n = 100 in the control group; mean [SD] age, 41.5 [15.4] years; 146 female [73%]), those in the intervention group demonstrated greater score reductions than those in the control group on the PHQ-9 (difference in changes: -2.60 [95% CI, -3.30 to -1.91]; P < .001) and the GAD-7 (difference in changes: -2.63 [95% CI, -3.35 to -1.99]; P < .001). Intervention participants had higher odds of achieving a score reduction greater than 20% (PHQ-9: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 14.29 [95% CI, 5.95-34.48], P < .001; GAD-7: AOR, 10.20 [95% CI, 5.08-20.41], P < .001) and categorical improvement (PHQ-9: AOR, 9.17 [95% CI, 4.35-19.61], P < .001; GAD-7: AOR, 7.14 [95% CI, 3.57-14.29], P < .001) compared with control participants. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of instructional emphasis on PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores among participants with anxiety or depression, findings suggest that variation in how questionnaire instructions are emphasized can influence PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores, underscoring the need for standardized administration in clinical, research, and digital settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06956378.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressionPatient Health QuestionnaireAdultAnxietyFemaleGeneralized Anxiety DisorderHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID42475096
PMCPMC13386762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.