ArticleJAMA network open2026
Sexual Orientation and Burnout Among Emergency Medicine Residents.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Burnout is highly prevalent among emergency medicine (EM) residents and is associated with negative outcomes for physician well-being and patient care. Emerging evidence suggests sexual minority trainees may be at increased risk, but differences within EM residency are not well characterized. Objective: To determine if burnout prevalence among EM residents differs by sexual orientation after adjustment for key confounders. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included US resident physicians who took the 2024 American Board of Emergency Medicine In-Training Exam (ITE) postexamination survey and answered the question on sexual orientation. Exposure: Sexual minority status (heterosexual or straight and sexual minority [lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer or questioning, asexual, pansexual, or other sexual identity]), adjusted for age, gender, race and ethnicity, postgraduate training year, program length, and region. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was burnout, assessed with an abbreviated 6-item Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: internal (personal or work-related) and external (patient-related) burnout. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were estimated for burnout stratified by sexual orientation, utilizing Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Results: Of 9478 residents who took the ITE, 7852 respondents (median [IQR] age, 30 [28-32] years; 4416 male [56%]; 3364 female [43%]; 56 nonbinary [1%]) were included, with 928 (12%) identifying as a sexual minority and 6924 (88%) identifying as heterosexual. Compared with heterosexual residents, sexual minority residents had higher prevalence of any burnout prevalence (431 of 803 residents [54%] vs 2786 of 5967 residents [47%]; P < .001) and internal burnout (311 of 802 residents [39%] vs 1902 of 5979 residents [32%]; P < .001). After adjustment, sexual minority status was associated with higher prevalence of internal burnout (PR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.24) and any burnout (PR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17). Among sexual minority subgroups, bisexual residents had the highest adjusted prevalence of any burnout (PR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.30), and queer residents had higher prevalence of internal burnout (PR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.62). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of 7852 EM residents, those who identified as a sexual minority reported higher burnout, particularly internal burnout, compared with heterosexual peers. These findings indicate that targeted support for sexual minority trainees is needed to improve physician well-being, training experience, and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.