Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474948›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026

Cerebellar Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: Frequency-Specific Modulation of Human Gait.

Marc Varel, Michael Doppelmayr, Sergiu Groppa, Traian Popa, Manuel Bange, Adrian Zeitner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc VarelDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute for Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany. mvarel@uni-mainz.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2175-6695
Michael DoppelmayrDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute for Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3435-7193
Sergiu GroppaDepartment of Neurology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-5655
Traian PopaMySpace Lab and NeuroRehab Research Center, Service of University Neurorehabilitation (SUN), Lausanne University Hospital, Institution of Lavigny and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-4830
Manuel BangeInstitute of Computer Science, Informatics for Medical Technology, University Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5247-8810
Adrian ZeitnerDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute for Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated locomotion depends on rhythmic neural interactions, with the cerebellum contributing to movement timing and scaling. However, how cerebellar oscillatory dynamics influence human gait remains unclear, despite its relevance for motor learning and rehabilitation. We hypothesized two frequency-dependent effects: (i) gait-matched cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (c-tACS) would produce stronger phase alignment than sham and selectively affect temporal rather than spatial gait parameters; and (ii) higher-frequency stimulation would preferentially modulate spatial gait parameters without consistent phase alignment with the ongoing locomotor rhythm. To test this, fifteen healthy adults received randomized bilateral c-tACS at their individual gait-cycle frequency (iGCF), iGCF ± 10% offsets, individual step frequency (iSF), a harmonic in alpha range (iGCF×10), 50 Hz (gamma), and sham. Head-mounted accelerometry recorded kinematics of continuous walking and a stop-and-go task. Phase synchrony between stimulation and gait periodicity was quantified using the debiased phase-locking value (dPLV). 50 Hz c-tACS increased gait velocity and stride length without altering cadence or stride time, indicating selective modulation of spatial gait parameters. In contrast, gait-matched stimulation (iGCF, iSF) produced strong stimulation-gait phase alignment but did not enhance temporal gait parameters beyond sham, arguing against entrainment-specific behavioral effects. dPLV declined with iGCF ± 10% during continuous walking, whereas a transient increase at iGCF-10% during stop-and-go was not specific to active stimulation. These findings support frequency-dependent effects of c-tACS on locomotion and refine the mechanistic understanding of how rhythmic cerebellar stimulation interacts with gait control, with potential implications for targeted neuromodulation.

Indexed as

CerebellumGaitTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAccelerometryAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCerebellumGaitNeuromodulationSynchronization

Identifiers

PMID42474948
PMCPMC13385040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.