ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
An explorative study of muscle eligibility and proposals for methods of measuring water holding capacity in guinea pigs.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work two methods are proposed with standardized protocols for water holding capacity assessment in species with limited muscle mass, facilitating comparative studies and quality control in emerging meat production systems. The objective of this study was to adapt two methods for water holding capacity assessment specifically for guinea pig meat, and to evaluate the effects of sex, age, and muscle type on expressible moisture and cooking loss. Ninety-six carcasses of Peru breed guinea pigs were dissected, and the muscles were evaluated for expressible moisture and cooking loss using the modified protocols. The results demonstrated that the proposed modified methods for evaluating expressible moisture and cooking loss were suitable for small animals such as rodents and capable of discriminating differences between muscles, age and sex of the guinea pigs. The semimembranosus muscle showed comparable expressible moisture values to longissimus thoracis et lumborum across all animal groups, while semitendinosus demonstrated similar cooking loss values to that representative muscle. These findings enable the preservation of longissimus thoracis et lumborum for additional meat quality analyses in guinea pigs, addressing a critical methodological gap in small animal meat research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.