ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Step-specific learning curve of the TMINI robotic system for total knee arthroplasty: a single-surgeon CUSUM analysis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) adoption continues to expand, yet most learning curve analyses focus on global operative time rather than individual procedural steps. The TMINI system is a handheld, imageless robotic platform with limited published data. We evaluated step-specific learning curves in a single surgeon's first 75 consecutive cases with complete intraoperative timing data. We retrospectively reviewed 75 primary TKAs performed with the TMINI system (January-August 2025). Four intraoperative timing metrics were recorded: bone registration time, intraoperative planning time, bone resection time, and time from incision to implants. Learning curves were assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis; turning points were identified at peak CUSUM values. Early-versus-later comparisons used Mann-Whitney U tests. Sensitivity analysis excluded extreme outliers (> mean + 3 SD). CUSUM turning points varied considerably by procedural step. Time to implants stabilized earliest (case 8; 12.0% median reduction; P = 0.006). Intraoperative planning time turned at case 12 (32.1% reduction; P < 0.001). Bone resection time trended toward improvement but did not reach significance in the primary cohort (P = 0.131); significance was achieved after outlier exclusion (35.0% median reduction; P < 0.001). Bone registration was most gradual, turning at case 56 (10.1% reduction; P = 0.002). Sensitivity analyses were consistent. The TMINI system demonstrated measurable but nonuniform step-specific learning curves across 75 cases. Cognitive and software-driven steps improved early, while platform-specific tasks such as bone registration required more cases to stabilize. Step-level CUSUM analysis provides a more actionable picture of TKA adoption than global operative time and may guide training and scheduling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.