Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474865›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Explainable machine learning for automated robotic surgical skill assessment using rich kinematic features.

Wang Xuan, Zhang Rui, Yang Mingxu, Muhammad Azam, Nadeem Ahmad, Raheem Sarwar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wang Xuan *Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, 102600, China.
Zhang RuiDepartment of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, 102600, China. zhangrui@bigc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-0706
Yang Mingxu *Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Xinliantie Group Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100044, China.
Muhammad Azam *Faculty of CS&IT, Superior University, Raiwind Road, Lahore, 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Nadeem Ahmad *Faculty of CS&IT, Superior University, Raiwind Road, Lahore, 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Raheem Sarwar *OTEHM, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 5JH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) extends minimally invasive surgery by restoring dexterity, tremor filtration, and ergonomic console control compared with open procedures and conventional laparoscopy. Objective, scalable skill assessment from console kinematics is therefore clinically relevant for competency-based training. Existing JIGSAWS studies often rely on random trial splits, isolated handcrafted features, or black-box models without subject-independent validation or transparent explanations. This study presents an explainable machine learning framework for automated skill classification from kinematic data alone. Using the public JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set (JIGSAWS), comprising 103 trials from 40 subjects across three dry-lab tasks, 633 trial-level kinematic features were extracted and six supervised classifiers were compared under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV). Random Forest (RF) with feature standardization was selected as the primary model; interpretability was assessed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Key gaps addressed include: subject-independent evaluation on all trials, systematic classifier comparison on identical features, collinearity-aware feature analysis, global and local SHAP attribution, and ablations (mean/standard-deviation features, segment-level modeling, PCA reduction, deep sequences, cross-task transfer). Under pooled LOSO-CV, RF with advanced kinematic features achieved 97.1% accuracy and Cohen's [Formula: see text] (macro-F1 [Formula: see text]; balanced accuracy [Formula: see text]), outperforming PCA-reduced features (92.2%) and segment-level modeling (88.3%). SHAP analysis identified jerk and velocity variability in master-tool channels as dominant discriminators. Cross-task evaluation showed strong in-task performance (97-100%) but reduced off-task transfer (61-95%). These benchmark findings may inform explainable kinematics-based training analytics; external multi-center validation remains required before clinical deployment.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMachine LearningRobotic Surgical ProceduresBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansRandom ForestExplainable artificial intelligenceJIGSAWSKinematic analysisRandom forestRobotic surgerySHAPSurgical skill assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.