ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Mapping the evolution of deep learning and computer vision in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis of surgical video intelligence, instrument perception, and clinical translation.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning and computer vision are increasingly embedded in robotic surgery, yet the development and translational direction of this research domain remain incompletely characterized. We conducted a bibliometric and visualization analysis of publications retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection using Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. A total of 1,186 documents published between 2010 and 2026 across 356 sources were included. Scientific output increased rapidly, with an annual growth rate of 16.09% and a peak of 216 publications in 2025. The field involved 5,296 authors, and international collaboration accounted for 30.69% of publications. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters was the most productive and locally influential source. China and the United States were the leading contributors, with China showing the most rapid recent expansion and the United States retaining the highest citation impact. Citation-burst and keyword analyses identified U-Net, residual learning, transformer architectures, and foundation-model-enabled segmentation as major methodological drivers. The conceptual structure evolved from image guidance, registration, and navigation toward surgical video intelligence, instrument perception, workflow understanding, autonomous assistance, and clinical translation. Instrument perception emerged as a central link between algorithmic development and operative application. Future progress will require diverse multi-institutional datasets, external and prospective validation, integrated scene understanding, and rigorous evaluation of intelligent assistance within real robotic surgical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.