Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474839›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026

Characterization and therapeutic potential of two Kayvirus phages against methicillin-resistant S. aureus in a rat myositis model.

Semra Tasdurmazli, Yasin Ali Cimen, Ebru Kanimdan, Fatma Bedia Karakaya Cimen, Buse Findikli, Mert Yılmaz, Emine Rumeysa Hekimoglu, Savas Ustunova, Mukaddes Esrefoglu, Abdurrahim Kocyigit and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Semra TasdurmazliFaculty of Science and Arts, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yasin Ali CimenFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ebru KanimdanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatma Bedia Karakaya CimenFaculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Yalova University, Yalova, Turkey.
Buse FindikliFaculty of Science and Arts, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mert YılmazFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emine Rumeysa HekimogluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Savas UstunovaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mukaddes EsrefogluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdurrahim KocyigitFaculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Luís D R MeloCenter of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
Tulin OzbekFaculty of Science and Arts, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. tulin.ozbek@yildiz.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-7045

Funding

The Health Institutes of Türkiye (TUSEB) 22479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to compromise the efficacy of conventional antibiotics, highlighting the urgent need for alternative antimicrobial strategies. This study aimed to isolate, characterize, and evaluate the therapeutic potential of two strictly lytic bacteriophages, Staphylococcus phages EAS1 and EAS2, against MRSA, including their safety and efficacy in an in vivo myositis model.

methodsEAS1 and EAS2 were isolated from wastewater and characterized using transmission electron microscopy, whole-genome sequencing, and in vitro functional assays. Genomic and comparative analyses were performed to assess genome organization and safety-related features. Therapeutic efficacy and toxicity were evaluated in a rat model of MRSA-induced myositis, with assessment of inflammatory mediators and histopathological tissue damage.

resultsBoth phages exhibited broad and potent lytic activity against S. aureus, including MRSA strains, and demonstrated high physicochemical stability and biocompatibility. Both phages possessed large linear dsDNA genomes (∼138-140 kb) encoding over 240 CDSs without lysogeny, virulence, or antibiotic resistance genes and were classified within the Kayvirus genus based on comparative genomics. In vivo, phage treatment caused no detectable hepatic or renal toxicity. EAS2 treatment led to significant modulation of inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α, IL-10, NF-κB, and COX-2, and resulted in reduced histopathological tissue damage compared with untreated control and vancomycin-treated groups.

conclusionThese findings demonstrate the stability, safety, and therapeutic efficacy of bacteriophages EAS1 and EAS2, particularly EAS2, supporting phage therapy as a promising alternative approach for the treatment of MRSA infections.

Indexed as

Kayvirus phagesMethicillin-resistant S. aureusMyositis modelPhage therapy

Identifiers

PMID42474839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.