ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Alternative set up strategies for upper tract robotic surgery with the Hugo RAS - experience from an early adopter institution.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Hugo RAS (Medtronic) represents a growing alternative to the DaVinci robotic platform, featuring a distinctive modular arm-cart design that may pose challenges for surgeons transitioning from established systems. Arm-cart positioning, restricted assistant access, and risk of personnel injury have been identified as barriers to adoption. Following FDA approval for urological procedures in 2025, optimizing a standardized, ergonomic set-up for upper tract cases is essential to facilitate broader uptake. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed at a single robot-naïve institution. All patients undergoing Hugo RAS upper tract procedures - including robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), radical nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, and nephroureterectomy - from January 2024 to May 2025 were included. Perioperative outcomes, set-up times, intraoperative events, and arm-cart repositioning requirements were recorded. A unilateral, four posterior arm-cart configuration with a linear or "W" port arrangement was employed in all. 54 upper tract procedures were performed across two expert robotic surgeons. No cases required intraoperative arm-cart repositioning. Median set-up time for RAPN improved by 8 min between the first and last quartile of cases (15 to 7 min). One additional port was required in a nephroureterectomy case. One minor assistant injury occurred. One case required open conversion for vascular bleeding. RENAL nephrometry scores ranged from 4 to 11 (median 7), with 44% classified as moderate-to-high complexity. A unilateral posterior arm-cart configuration with linear port placement is feasible, reproducible, and familiar to DaVinci-experienced surgeons, improving ergonomics, workflow, and set-up efficiency for Hugo RAS upper tract procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.